Hi, I did briefly skim over the docs and compare between v1 and v2. The only point I have right now is that the docs for v2 are much less motivating compared to v1. The examples provided in v1 are clear and simple. In v2 I find the syntax less clear for describing the purpose of what is trying to be achieved. This could just be a documentation issue or an issue in the new library I have not had a chance to look through it thoroughly. To summarise that point, I read v1 docs and think, hey this library might be useful to make some things in my code clearer. Reading the docs for v2 i wonder why i would bother as the syntax looks complicated compared to manually doing the assigns. From looking at the v2 docs i was not motivated to want to use this library. I think there needs to be more motivating examples. A case in point is the very first example shown. It has so much more in it than just showing off Assign v2 and it makes the purpose of Assign v2 more difficult to understand. Most of the example is the loop and not the assign.