Kirit Sælensminde wrote:
Let's have more FP in C++! :-)
I've got to agree. The egg library looks like an incredible bit of work. I'd love to see this in Boost too.
If boosters think so, I could prepare it for review. It seems to take more time, though. BTW, I'm tempted to rename Egg to Boost.Functor.
I for one though do find it confusing when there is overlap between libraries because normally the documentation of the libraries don't discus each other's strengths and weaknesses and why you might want to choose one over the other.
That isn't to say that there shouldn't be overlap between libraries, but it would be nice if the documentation of the libraries cross tied a bit more.
I think this confusion sometimes comes from the fact that libraries don't define Concept names. "A FunctionObject that can be used with boost::bind" is not good. :-) Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame