"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger@neoscientists.org> wrote
That's not exactly what I meant. It's possible to
#define REG_SPEC(a,b) \ ... struct my_traits< a_private_return_type b > { ... }
Do you mean: ... struct my_traits< a_private_return_type(b) > { ... } ?
And then use "my_traits< a_private_return_type(T) >".
However, we can't apply this technique globally because not all types are valid function parameter types (this is what I meant with "extra work" in the sentence below).
Which types are not valid? void?
I also switched to 80 (was 50) -- let's see if it works...
Obviously not so really. As another experiment I told my client not to break lines at all (if my posts remain readable it should be a solution).
I don't have such option. Trying maximum (132). Regards, Arkadiy