26 Jun
2013
26 Jun
'13
6:40 p.m.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Gottlob Frege <gottlobfrege@gmail.com>wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:21 PM, David Sankel <camior@gmail.com> wrote:
Let me give that do notation I mentioned in the earlier email a better definition:
do( stmt1, stmt2, stmt3 ).
I don't think C++ guarantees the order of those statements. Is that a problem?
No. The actual evaluation of those expressions (which can be though of as 'lazy'), if they are evaluated a all, will occur in the body of the do function in the correct order. C++ expressions, of course, will be evaluated before the do function is entered, but this shouldn't cause any issues. David