AMDG On 2/5/2011 9:26 AM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Alexander Nasonov<alnsn@yandex.ru> wrote:
Steven and I were playing with different syntaxes few years ago
We came up with something like this:
void BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION ( BOOST_BIND((factor)(&sum)), double num ) { sum += factor * num; std::clog<< "Summed: "<< sum<< std::endl; } BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION_DECL(add)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/168612/focus=168694
Yes, Alex that is exactly where I started and I cannot thank you enough for your Boost.ScopeExit work which has served as a solid basis for my Boost.Local development.
However: 1) How is this syntax is preferable to Boost.Local parenthesized syntax? To me, there is not much difference.*
The argument list is more readable, because it's closer to normal C++ syntax.
2) How would you pass multiple local function parameters (not just the one parameter `num`) using this syntax?
Black magic. I don't remember how, but I know we did figure this out.
3) Can you generate local function that are passed as template parameters using this syntax?
I think so. It wouldn't be very useful otherwise would it? In Christ, Steven Watanabe