20 Mar
2017
20 Mar
'17
5:29 p.m.
Niall Douglas wrote:
Back on topic, I think that the current process of getting a library into the review queue is a bit outdated. I suggest we make use of existing infrastructure and make a Github repository "review" owned by the Review Wizard in which submissions occur by way of the endorsing Boost member creating an issue with the description of the library.
The problem with this is that we don't want one member endorsing a library for review. We want *lots*.
Almost without doubt when potential review managers scan the list of review pending libraries, they will prioritise those libraries with the most public endorsements.
How would they know which libraries have the most endorsements?