Beman Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
On 10/09/2011 04:57 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
Le 09/10/11 15:30, Mathias Gaunard a écrit :
I would like a BOOST_FORCE_INLINE macro to be added to boost/config/suffix.hpp
What do you want BOOST_FORCE_INLINE to be replaced for?
As the name suggests, __forceinline or __attribute__((always_inline))
What compilers provide support? Do they spell it the same way?
--Beman
If one compiler spells it as '__forceinline', while another calls it 'always_inline', I'd suggest naming the macro 'BOOST_FORCE_ALWAYS_INLINE'. My 2 cents, Niels -- Niels Dekker http://www.xs4all.nl/~nd/dekkerware Scientific programmer at LKEB, Leiden University Medical Center