22 May
2008
22 May
'08
10:11 a.m.
At the cost of one additional template instantiation (power<0> will always be instantiated) we get rid of the second parameter and have no runtime evaluation, as advocated in the other thread.
Oops... I realize that this falls back to the solution initially proposed by John Moeller and that had been rejected by Hervé due to the multiplication by 1. Sorry :-) Bruno