18 Mar
2008
18 Mar
'08
3:06 p.m.
Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:
Any existing header order dependency would be news to me and I would be interested in seeing it fixed.
Given that you've expended the effort to find the problem in a specific case, do you have any suggestion about what change should be made?
Robert Ramey
I don't have a fix for it. The best suggestion I can offer is to analyze the headers for a header include cycle and then break it. As long as it compiles and de-serializes a 1.32 shared_ptr, it is sufficient for my purposes. I don't have time to analyze the headers myself at the moment, but I hope I've given you enough information to help you find the problem. Let me know if there's any more information I can give you. Clif Houck