Hi, in addition to the things others already mentioned here (and I agree with most the points made by them) I have some remarks regarding the ordering of the top page: 1st: IMHO the 'Participation' section isn't necessary at the top page. A first time visitor is interested in the 'whats', not in the 'hows'. 2nd: The 'Latest News' should move near the top of the page. That means, the news have to be shortened. I would go with something along: 07/01/2005: Version 1.33.0 released. It includes some new outstanding libraries improving the handling of streams, hash functions (aso). (a)Read more...(/a) Just some sentences are enough. Whoever is interested in a in-depth description, will follow the link. For all the others the date will be more interesting since it indicates a living product (as long as the last entry isn't outdated ;-). 3rd: 'The Boost web site provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries.' As far as I understand english, the site doesn't provide the libs. The boost community provides them. 'The emphasis is on libraries which work well with the C++ Standard Library.' I wouldn't emphasize on that any longer. Working well with the C++ SL is rather a precondition now. Maybe rewriting these crucial first sentences would be the best. Best regards Olaf Krzikalla