Re: [boost] [test] Looking for co-developer/maintainer

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup] Kim Barrett asserted that the existing detail in the documentation was useful and necessary and that somehow I had done the library a disservice by removing detail. Yet, when asked: boost@lists.boost.org spake the secret code thusly:

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

boost@lists.boost.org spake the secret code <6F8C95D8-715C-4900-96A1-4EAF1B4B8EC8@verizon.net> thusly:

...

[...] So when I hear someone suggesting that there is too much detail in the Boost.Test documentation, and that some of it should be thrown away, I get very nervous.

Have you looked at my version of the documentation? http://user.xmission.com/~legalize/tmp/boost.test/libs/test/doc/html/index.h...

What is missing from there that you feel needs to be documented?

I receive no response. I can therefore only conclude that the new documentation isn't missing anything that's necessary as I asked this question in February, almost three months ago. -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline The Computer Graphics Museum http://computergraphicsmuseum.org The Terminals Wiki http://terminals.classiccmp.org Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com