Gennaro Prota writes:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:19:45 -0500, Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> wrote:
Surely there is a lot of room for improvement (as illustrated by http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?Boost.Testing), but the above sounds like you think they are in flux, and if so, you should list the particular issues that led you to this conclusion, or otherwise it's FUD. For instance, surely you could check 1.33.1 report pages before making the claim that dynamic_bitset wasn't tested with CW 8.3 (or any other toolset)?
Yes. The "particular issues which led me to this conclusion" are listed in the initial post of this thread.
All of them but one are perfectly ordinary environment/linking issues, no? OK, may be they are not normal that far in the release cycle, but that's hardly a "regression test mess".
- For some failures no error message is reported, so that it is pretty much impossible for the developer to fix them; e.g.: http://tinyurl.com/zmpwk
We will look into this one.
Surely you could read a little above before making the claim that anyone spreads FUD, especially when it comes to people who is being here for years.
I did. -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering