On Friday 19 March 2010 04:34:04 Jamie Allsop wrote:
Vladimir Prus wrote:
Boosters,
2. The reviews and all comments should be submitted to the developers list, boost@lists.boost.org and the email should have "[log]" prefix in the subject to make sure it's not missed. The deadline for reviews is
23:59, March 17, PST = 2:59, March 18, EST = 7:59 March 18, GMT = 10:59, March 18 MSK
Unfortunately I left on a business trip the day the review period started and return this morning. I'd like to submit a late review if that is acceptable. We are currently using this library in a real project and so if my issues have not been addressed in other comments I'd like to make sure I raise them.
I had previously reviewed at least one other log library effort and have used both of John Torjo's libraries in various projects. If a late review is acceptable please give me a reasonable cut-off date for providing it.
Jamie, your review will be welcome, but if possible, please focus on the new issues you have discovered -- e.g. the state of docs and implementation is pretty much well established, so it's only important to know how the library fits your real use cases. I hope to announce the review results around: 23:59, March 24, PST = 2:59, March 25, EST = 7:59 March 25, GMT = 10:59, March 25 MSK All follow-up comments or late reviews better be submitted at least 24 hours before this date to be included. Is this fine with you? - Volodya