On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 14:36, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot@gmail.com> wrote:
It would be good to know what those additional tools/features are. And more apt, if they are things that authors would want or need.
I cannot help on this side as I'm mostly using GHC, but I think there are github power-users in the boost community who would love to help.
2. GCH provide Subversion and Mercurial repositories while GitHub
provides Git only repositories.
Correction; GCH provides Subversion, Mercurial, and Git < http://code.google.com/p/**support/wiki/**ChoosingAVersionControlSystem<http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ChoosingAVersionControlSystem>
**.
That's news to me! Itwasn't the case when I setup my projects few months ago, thanks for pointing it.
Although that gives a similar result to the traditional vault, it has one significant drawback. It introduces a management layer for Boost for each proposed library/file. This is worse than both the old vault (self-registration) and sandbox (one-time moderator registration).
I don't understand what "management layer" you are talking about exactly? I was thinking like just a few scripts that regularly pull repositories changes would make the "management" automatic. Joël Lamotte