30 Sep
2004
30 Sep
'04
4:40 p.m.
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
No, it's not; C++ behavior _is defined in terms of_ volatile (and I/O calls), not the other way around.
As if rule. And C++ says nothing about mutiple threads.
Nope. "As if" is defined in terms of observable behavior, and "observable behavior" is defined in terms of volatile and I/O.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=4152B42E.2B271094%40web.de
Also nope. Volatile accesses aren't really implementation defined. ;-) You are right about reordering, though.