26 Sep
2005
26 Sep
'05
5:53 p.m.
[note to mods: apologies, please kill my earlier post on this. It was over aggressive in removal of context.]
Ultimately it seems that the quality of Boost rests on the experience of its library authors and reviewers, so how does an observer assess that?
Trust and judgement. One useful input, for those that can judge it is, IMHO: http://www.boost.org/people/people.htm -- Alec Ross