"Mat Marcus" <mat-boost@emarcus.org> wrote
It would be useful to hear your opinion even if you are not an expert in the functional programming domain
I am not much experienced with functional style of programming but in spite of this I think FC++ should be part of Boost ;-) IMO its documentation should be expanded: - every code snippet in tutorial should have link to small but complete example - feature description should contain performance impact: CPU/memory/template nesting requirements. - there should be page with links to all examples and their short description (btw. example file names aren't very informative). - it would be nice to have formal style reference documentation Substantial part of FC++ compiles with Intel C++ 7.0 (plugged into VC6 IDE), few found problems looks fixable. I informed author about details in private email. /Pavel