Re: [boost] [config] BOOST_NO_LONG_LONG_NUMERIC_LIMITS notdetectedcorrectly?

Hmm, seems the other way round. Is this how it should be?

Ah! I think I have an idea what's going on here: even with BOOST_NO_CONFIG defined some options get defined in suffix.hpp; for example if there's no long long then there's no numeric_limits<long long> either, and this is messing up the configure script logic, I believe the configure script is now fixed in cvs. John.