13 Sep
2008
13 Sep
'08
5:27 p.m.
If only the Rng& version were provided it would be impossible to pass a rvalue range to find. If only the const Rng& version were provided, we would always add const even when it isn't needed (I'm not sure that this matters for find, since it is a non-mutating algorithm, though)
The Rng& version is needed because if you pass in a mutable range, you may want a mutable iterator as return value. Arno -- Dr. Arno Schoedl · aschoedl@think-cell.com Technical Director think-cell Software GmbH · Invalidenstr. 34 · 10115 Berlin, Germany http://www.think-cell.com · phone +49-30-666473-10 · toll-free (US) +1-800-891-8091 Directors: Dr. Markus Hannebauer, Dr. Arno Schoedl · Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 85229