
31 Oct
2006
31 Oct
'06
2 a.m.
On 10/30/06, Martin Knoblauch Revuelta
Back to the naming issue, and more important: another precedent of the idea in boost, "order-statistics trees" together with "ranked indices" are the names used in the "future work" section of multi_index documentation: http://www.boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/future_work.html#ranked_indices
My opinion is still that os-tree is a name for the underlying data structure, not the sequence interface itself. Rank may be a good adjective for some sort of composite name though. Maybe 'rankseq', or 'ranklist'. I still like the simplicity of 'chain' though. -Jason