On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:15:02 +0100, Francois Duranleau <xiao.bai.xiong@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]If we look at the variant using a vector for arguments, in that case, seems like it is quite trivial to get the executable as the first element in the vector. Anyways, seems to me that either you have to merge args in a vector in a single string on Windows, or split the string into an array of args on Unix. So if you anyway have to split, why not make run_exe optional? Or are you using the shell on Unix? Hopefully not (sorry, I did not download and look at the code, just the documentation a bit).
You are right, the command line is indeed already split.
[...]no need for set_cmd_line and set_args to be different. In this case, args could be overloaded for a string (and/or c string) and a sequence (templated), or even a range or pair of iterators. args could be named something else, my point is, the command line being specified as a string or a sequence of tokens serves the same final purpose, hence it seems to me there is no need for a different name. Granted, this
Yep, sounds all reasonable to me. That's definitely something which should be put back on the todo-list. Thanks for your feedback, too! Boris