2012/5/9 Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco@osl.iu.edu>:
On Wed, 9 May 2012, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
2012/5/8 Jeremiah Willcock <jewillco@osl.iu.edu>:
graph and graph_parallel are fine; property_map is reasonable except that the things that are in include/boost/pending should be in that directory in graph/ instead. Does it make sense to modularize utility to split things like enable_if out into separate trees like you are doing at the top level of Boost?
Jeremiah,
could you please have a look at the modularization manifest file? https://github.com/ryppl/boost-modularize/blob/master/manifest.txt
As you see, boost/pending is split across several modules. Should everything be part of graph instead?
All of boost/pending in property_map should be moved to graph, other than maybe cstddef.hpp, which might go to core or somewhere. Otherwise, boost/pending seems to me to be split up correctly.
Done.
-- Jeremiah Willcock
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost