What actions (if any) are the regression testers expect to do to handle this "branch"? I presume if any are required that the boost-testing list will be so notified. At Tuesday 2004-10-19 09:58, you wrote:
Martin Wille wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
I'll post another notice right before the branching, and yet another one when it's complete.
Shouldn't the Boost.Test failures be fixed first?
It's never been the case that all bugs must be fixed before branching. In fact, I'm a little surprised that we waited this long before branching. Of course, it would be much better if the codebase were kept much cleaner ongoingly.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"