Re: [boost] [assert] static_assert envy

From: Thorsten Ottosen I'm fine with BOOST_ASSERT_MSG(). Since we are adding assert.hpp I would like to see

BOOST_ASSERT_IF() BOOST_ASSERT_IF_MSG()

as well. It is really much clearer to read and maintain than

BOOST_ASSERT( !foo() || condition );

And possibly BOOST_FAIL/BOOST_FAIL_MSG, equivalent to BOOST_ASSERT(false)/BOOST_ASSERT(false, msg)? Analogous method is found in .NET library and I happened to find it useful several times. Regards, Robert