j
k
j a
j l
On 4/24/2011 1:05 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
The following output: [...] Order of destruction: A: 0 A: 1 A: 2 A: 3 ~A: 3 ~A: 2 ~A: 1 ~A: 0
The following output: [...]
Order of destruction: A: 0 A: 1 A: 2 A: 3 ~A: 3 ~A: 2 ~A: 1 ~A: 0
Sorry, the opposite is the correct way: Order of destruction: A: 0 A: 1 A: 2 A: 3 ~A: 0 ~A: 1 ~A: 2 ~A: 3 -Phil
Back to the thread
Back to the list
