Re: [boost] Re: Re: [iostreams] example_test and newline_testloop ongcc-3_3-darwin

On May 19, 2005, at 2:21 AM, Martin Wille wrote:

Jonathan Turkanis wrote:

...

I'm now testing the hypothesis that the problem is std::rand behaving badly on these platforms. I've switched to Boost.Random, and have left just one of the problem tests, newline_test.cpp, uncommented.

newline_test passes now (intel 8.1/Linux) taking only 1.2 seconds here when I run it manually.

Works on gcc-3_3-darwin, too. Thanks Jonathan! Doug