whoops, let me rephrase that: Actually, this thread started with the idea that spirit::karma (or whatever it is) should be considered as an alternative to including Loki.SafeFormat in boost. ... 2) the fact that no one looking to see if boost had a safe formating library library would be expected to find "sprite::karma". Robert Ramey Sebastian Redl wrote:
Robert Ramey wrote:
Actually, this thread started with the idea that spirit::karma (or whatever it is) should be considered as an alternative to including a separate logging library in boost. No, it didn't. The logging thread is entirely separate and has absolutely nothing to do with this one. This thread started about adopting Loki.SafeFormat, which is similar to Boost.Format. 2) the fact that no one looking to see if boost had a logging library would be expected to find "sprite::karma". A good thing Karma is a text manipulation library then, as is all of Spirit.
Sebastian _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost