[boost] Re: cycle_iterator update

"Neal D. Becker" <ndbecker2@verizon.net> writes:

Here is an update to cycle_iterator. This is based on the original design by Gennadiy Rozental. After fairly extensive performance testing I am getting good results (compared to my old implementation which was hand-written, not based on boost iterators), after adding operator[].

... which got poor results? Just wondering. BTW, not to keep nitpicking but I object to the name cycle_facade. iterator_facade really is just a facade for iterators, but cycle_facade is a full-fledged iterator and should be called cycle_iterator. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com