10 Feb
2005
10 Feb
'05
9:47 p.m.
Michael Glassford <glassfordm@hotmail.com> wrote: Preston A. Elder wrote:
Is there any fantastically good reason why there is no way of getting a count of how many threads are being handled by a thread_group?
<snip>
Obviously, I could write my own thread_group, but I can think of no reason for boost's thread_group to not have a count() method.
I don't see one either. I'll look into adding one.
Keeping the count correct in the face of exceptions or other cancellations may have some consequences... matt.