Daniel Walker skrev:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> wrote:
And the change was motivated by real user feedback, something which the original review in some sense could not provide as much of.
I'm sure you had feedback regarding iterator_range. However, I seriously doubt that you received feedback from users demanding that empty(r) be immediately removed from the definition of the Range concept. That doesn't make any sense,
The feedback was related to the core concepts and on how to map your own type to the range concept. This task was greatly simlpified in the new version. Having redundant spec in a concept is never going to fly. I'm to busy to argue this case anymore. The original design was much worse than the current. Period. -Thorsten