7 Mar
2007
7 Mar
'07
12:43 a.m.
On 3/6/07, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com> wrote:
Jason Turner wrote:
There has been some discussions about the future concept on this list and there is an implementation of futures available in the boost sandbox vault here: http://tinyurl.com/2bxjj5. What is the difference between this and your proposal?
As far as I can tell, the existing futures implementation does not support the active object (to provide an existing class with a message queue) concept, but it could have been used as the basis for my implementation. I was not aware of the futures project.
Regards Hartmut
-Jason