Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] gcc-warnings in yield_k.hpp

21 Apr 2008

      Juergen Hunold:
...
...
I've got a small fix attached which (hopefully) initialises "rqtp"
completely in the initialiser list and removes the (hopefully)
redundant assignments.
else
     {
-        struct timespec rqtp = { 0 };
+        struct timespec rqtp = { 0, 1000 };

-        rqtp.tv_sec = 0;
-        rqtp.tv_nsec = 1000;
-
         nanosleep( &rqtp, 0 );
     }

POSIX says that struct timespec has at least the members tv_sec and tv_nsec, 
but it doesn't guarantee their order or placement. Does

    struct timespec rqtp = {};

still emit the warnings?

Re: [boost] [shared_ptr] gcc-warnings in yield_k.hpp

Peter Dimov