
10 Oct
2006
10 Oct
'06
5:49 a.m.
Jeremy Pack said: (by the date of Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:04:01 -0600)
1 - I will check through the extended_type_info documentation to see if it will be able to provide each of the requirements that I feel necessary. It sounds like it does.
Also Robert mentioned that the real magic (the one that needs to be separated) is hidden in iserialer.hpp. However I was unable to find this file, my closest match was ./archive/detail/iserializer.hpp :)
One important question: should we avoid requiring RTTI?
IMHO one more option for the users is good. But better first have a working prototype, then add new features, like no_rtti support. -- Janek Kozicki |