j
k
j a
j l
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:
...As a matter of fact, IMO the header itself is ill-advised and should be removed. As is boost::noncopyable itself. ;-)
As a matter of fact, IMO the header itself is ill-advised and should be removed.
As is boost::noncopyable itself. ;-)
Why so? I've never heard the arguments against it. -- Steven E. Harris
Back to the thread
Back to the list
