22 Sep
2004
22 Sep
'04
7:31 p.m.
--- Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> wrote:
I'm not personally interested in porting to this compiler, but it seems that it should configure
#define BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING 1
this could actually make boost.range work 90% on this compiler. Can anybody see any problems in defining this flag for this compiler?
I could try it out if you tell me where you want to put the define, e.g. via a patch. Ralf _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com