Peter Dimov wrote:
I'd like to start working on a Boost implementation of my threading proposal N2178:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2178.html
but, as you'll see if you take a look at it, it differs from the current Boost.Threads and Howard Hinnant's competing N2184 in a number of important places, and having two competing libraries in Boost that do the same thing may not be a good idea.
I don't think it's a bad idea. We already have libraries with overlapping functionalities in Boost and that didn't cause major harm so far. Threading is subject to rather intense debating. In order to proceed towards an agreement, being able to to test the proposals against real applications would be of great benefit. Perhaps, such a library should, if it is shipped as part of Boost, be labeled as a supplement to a standard proposal. This would be an indicator that there may be less long-term support for such a library than users would normally expect for other Boost libraries. Proper wording for that would need to be found.
So what would be the best way to proceed?
Implement (the C++ interface of) it in the boost::n2178 namespace? Regards, m Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com