Re: [boost] shared_ptr<>: why no operator[] ? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

yes of course, Julien and Gaby you are right, I was misreading it. Confusion with std::vector<int> p(42), I think. cheers Gareth -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/shared-ptr-why-no-operator-tp3697208p3698... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.