Re: [boost] temp_ptr<> - preventing use as a member

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:

AMDG

On 11/13/2011 04:41 PM, Gottlob Frege wrote:

...

I'm trying to see if I can replace all raw pointers with suitable smart pointers that clearly describe the pointer's lifetime, sharing, etc.

For example, a pointer passed into a function, that is only valid for the lifetime of the function call.  A temp_ptr or callstack_ptr or ... some better name.

This sounds a lot like scoped_ptr.

Sounds more like a ptr that doesn't own it's content...