16 Feb
2015
16 Feb
'15
8:58 a.m.
On Monday 16 February 2015 08:30:58 Fu ji wrote:
Thank you for the reply. I see that you have almost all functionality done, I miss only something equivalent to WaitForMultipleObjects it is in your plans for the future functionality ?
On POSIX systems this is only achievable with select() & co., which in turn implies that synchronization primitives must be fd-based. I currently have no plans for implementing that, mostly because I recon that such primitives would have worse performance in the normal use (i.e. when a single primitive is used for thread synchronization).