-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/05/2010 03:40 PM, DE wrote:
I was just wishing, when I wrote that, that I did know someone who did that... purely out of curiosity, I wanted to ask why they (i.e. you) did that? Is it just to make it more obvious that it's supposed to be a positive number instead of a negative one?
i think i expressed my thought incorrectly (or misinterpreted your message) i meant i'm the person who would expect overloaded unary 'operator+' to be out there it's natural that it does nothing (i.e. returns unmodified argument)
Darn, and here I thought I'd finally get that burning question answered. ;-) - -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvh3D8ACgkQp9x9jeZ9/wR5UQCdFETzpD8uB44cXGPpjvyVoR5f /LYAnjRyOq4G4EukPJ7CGilfFhdsj3mN =zMCT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----