26 Sep
2005
26 Sep
'05
7:56 a.m.
Jason Hise <chaos@ezequal.com> writes:
Because the singleton library is now being designed to work with shared memory in addition to allowing multiple instances in a singleton_map (multiton), I have a particularly difficult situation to deal with. The main problem is: when a multiton exists in shared memory, who should own the timeout threads associated with each instance?
How about each process that accesses the singleton having a thread that checks the timeout? Anthony -- Anthony Williams Software Developer Just Software Solutions Ltd http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk