
27 Jan
2010
27 Jan
'10
2:52 p.m.
Jeffrey Hellrung wrote:
As Steven Watanabe noted, "AFAIK, it's impossible."
These sound like very specific constructors that you're looking for, however, so it might be reasonable to use a "flag typedef" within the class (intrusive) and/or an explicitly specialized metafunction (non-intrusive)...?
- Jeff
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Ya, I was already using the "flag typedef" method, but was just wondering if something non-intrusive was feasible...maybe it isn't. A compiler with 0x support isn't an option I'm afraid.