Re: [boost] [iterator] lvalue-ness resurrection in transform_iterator?

David Abrahams wrote:

Looks like a good idea.

I wanted to see if this strategy is theoretically right. I'm relieved to hear that. :-)

Did you check to see if it breaks any tests?

FWIW, gcc-3.4, gcc-4.1 (mingw), msvc-7.1, and msvc-8.0 pass. Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame