26 Feb
2010
26 Feb
'10
4:15 a.m.
On 02/26/2010 02:04 AM, Daniel James wrote:
On 25 February 2010 20:16, Andrey Semashev<andrey.semashev@gmail.com> wrote:
I think, this would at least delay the official acceptance of Boost.Atomic, as there will be less spur for it to happen.
Since it looks unlikely that Boost.Atomic is going to put be up for review in the foreseeable future,
Is that so? Is it known why?
delaying another library to encourage it would be counter productive.
I think helping the author to bring the library into Boost would do a better job to the community.