Re: [boost] [Config] N3276 decltype support on VC++ 11

Eric Niebler wrote:

I'm tempted to simply merge the changes, the odd breakage here and there be damned. We stand a bigger risk with such a fundamental piece of infrastructure differing between trunk and release, IMO. Thoughts?

I couldn't expect proper fixes for decltype-based result_of compatibility will take place soon. So, if we push the result_of change into the release branch, shouldn't we replace `result_of` with `tr1_result_of` for the breaking components ? Regards, Michel