David Abrahams wrote:
Yuval Ronen <ronen_yuval@yahoo.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
I'm just looking through the variant library docs in detail and had the following commments: Ah, if only boost::variant was actively maintained...
Would you like to take over maintenance of boost::variant? It shouldn't be a big job; the interface is fairly stable.
As incredibly tempting as it sounds (really, it does!), I'm afraid I won't be able to truly provide support and maintenance for the library. I'll probably use this mandate to get several things I want to change, but then I won't have enough time to properly test it, document it and port it to all platforms. At the end of the day, if I'm not fully committed to invest the time needed, which I'm afraid I'm not, I'll do more harm than good. Of course I'm not against having write access to the Boost CVS, but it's unlikely I'll use it for the above mentioned reason. But thanks a lot for the offer!