23 May
2004
23 May
'04
7:19 a.m.
"Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental@thomson.com> writes:
I plan in this release to add an ability to run a test case by name. It may help you a bit. As for random order I will think about it, but it fills a
Sorry. Meant *feels*.
bit incorrect (see above).
I don't know why; randomization of tests is good, as long as the seed is written when a test fails and a specific seed can be injected to reproduce the case. It means that your tests aren't unintentionally dependent on some arbitrary order or input data/size you may have chosen. I've used this strategy very successfully in the past. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com