Peter Dimov wrote:
Vladimir Prus wrote:
Of all Boost.Test functionality I use only 'test_main' and BOOST_CHECK, and I'd be really gratefull if that subset just worked.
#include <boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp>
int main() { int x = 0;
BOOST_TEST( ++x == 1 ); BOOST_TEST( ++x == 1 );
return boost::report_errors(); }
Thank you Peter. After the release, I'll definitely move Spirit to use this simple, no frills, test utility. The requirements for such a facility should be 1) Works 100% on *ALL* compilers 2) Is transparent and does not get in the way (you can pretend it's not there at all) 3) Is 100% stable (no frequent API changes) 4) Is as simple as possible (less chance for Murphy's law to kick in). IMO, Boost.Test does not satisfactorily satisfy these requirements. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net