On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Eric Niebler <eric@boost-consulting.com> wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
To start with, there's one very basic thing we won't be able to do: name template specializations that cannot be instantiated, like
vector<foo(bar)>
just for DSEL purposes.
Ugh! I suppose this would work around the issue:
vector<call<foo(bar)>>
as long as call<> happened to be Regular.
What about template<class Wrapped<typename T...>, typename ArgList... > class bind; bind<vector, foo(bar(_1)), _2> That should work, even if 'Wrapped' requires it template arguments to conform to some exotic concept. Or may be something like this: bind<vector>(foo(bar(_1)), _2) Untested of course, and I'm not sure how concepts interact with template template parameters. -- gpd