3 Mar
2009
3 Mar
'09
9:26 p.m.
AMDG Emil Dotchevski wrote:
2) convert<std::string> necessarily returns std::string (I think it's important user-defined conversions to have the freedom to return char const *. Many interfaces that take strings are commonly overloaded for std::string and char const * for efficiency reasons.)
How common is this going to be in reality? Won't returning const char* usually introduce problems with memory management? In Christ, Steven Watanabe